Apply · 2.3
Spectrum, radio coverage and mobility
Time: about 8–11 minutes including the task; estimate
Guiding question: Why does supported spectrum not prove service continuity along a route?
Learning objective: You assess band support, coverage and handover separately.
Prerequisites: Previous lessons through 2.2, particularly the case file developed there.
A route is more than a frequency
Lea's train moves from a cutting onto open track. Although it uses the same service, radio conditions change. A frequency band is a defined frequency range. Radio coverage instead describes whether the required connection is possible at a particular location under the conditions considered. A band listed in a device specification does not prove adequate route coverage.
For the European railway context, we consider n100 with 874.4–880 MHz uplink and 919.4–925 MHz downlink, and n101 with 1900–1910 MHz. Uplink means from the terminal towards the network; downlink is the opposite direction. n100 uses separate frequency ranges for the directions: Frequency Division Duplex (FDD). n101 separates the directions in time: Time Division Duplex (TDD). Spectrum allocation, national use and device support remain separate checks. [S08; S12; S38]
Both directions need adequate coverage
A base station received strongly by a train may still be unable to receive a weak train signal reliably. Transmit power, antennas, cable losses and propagation therefore need consideration in both directions. Tunnels and cuttings may differ from open track. Speed also changes the time available for transitions between coverage areas. The later link-budget lesson quantifies part of this relationship; it does not replace route measurements.
Handover is the transfer of an existing mobile connection between serving radio cells or the resources provided for that purpose. It supports mobility. A radio-cell change is not automatically a change of network operator or FRMCS service platform. Roaming and service-domain transitions are therefore addressed separately later. [S13]
A useful trial
Talbahn records location, direction of travel, radio access used and the end-to-end effect. During a transition, a voice call may remain established while voice packets temporarily stop arriving. “Call not released” and “no audible interruption” are different criteria. A data case also needs the application's view of interruption and recovery.
The trial uses a stated load and the intended train equipment. A measurement with a handheld at a window cannot simply be transferred to a roof antenna, different cabling and different on-board equipment. The case file makes conditions part of the result.
Check your understanding
The train receives a strong signal and remains registered during a cell change. Does this demonstrate uninterrupted speech?
Model answer
No. Signal strength and registration demonstrate neither the complete uplink nor a continuous media flow. Observe both directions, the transition and the audible effect under defined conditions. An established call may still contain a media interruption.
What to remember
Band support, coverage, mobility and service continuity are related but distinct properties.
Your Talbahn case file
Define a route transition and observations for voice and data. Label numerical values as project requirements or teaching values, not invented FRMCS limits.
Sources
S08 · ETSI TS 103 765-1: FRMCS Transport Stratum
ETSI TS 103 765-1: FRMCS Transport Stratum
Version: 1.1.1, January 2026 · Checked: 2026-10-11
Scope: Transport architecture, 5G, n100/n101 spectrum, mobility and multiple paths.
Limitations: No general end-to-end performance guarantee; QoS terminology additionally uses S13.
Used in: 1.9, 2.1, 2.3, 2.18, 3.6
S12 · CEPT ECC Decision (20)02
Version: Adopted 20 November 2020; updated 10 June 2022; amended 28 June 2024 · Checked: 2026-10-11
Scope: Harmonised Railway Mobile Radio conditions and frequency ranges. The official ECC catalogue lists the amendment of 28 June 2024 (ECC#64).
Limitations: 10 June 2022 is an older edition. The official CEPT catalogue substantiates the 2024 amendment; direct PDF retrieval is restricted. Catalogue: https://docdb.cept.org/document/category/ECC_Decisions?status=ACTIVE ; newer PDF: https://docdb.cept.org/download/4521 ; older PDF: https://docdb.cept.org/download/4039 .
Used in: 2.3, 3.6
S13 · 3GPP TS 23.501, published as ETSI TS 123 501
3GPP TS 23.501, published as ETSI TS 123 501
Version: 16.14.0, September 2022 · Checked: 2026-10-11
Scope: Section 5.7: QoS Flow, 5QI, ARP, GBR and Non-GBR.
Limitations: Explicit terminology reference, not presented as the latest edition or a complete FRMCS project baseline.
Used in: 2.2, 2.3, 2.10, 2.18
S38 · Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1730 – RMR spectrum
Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1730 – RMR spectrum
Version: 28 September 2021 · Checked: 2026-10-11
Scope: Harmonised frequency ranges 874.4–880 / 919.4–925 and 1900–1910 MHz.
Limitations: National spectrum rights and further conditions of use remain necessary.
Used in: 2.3
Your progress is stored in this browser on this device.